Connect with us

Popular

Drake & Stake.com Partnership: Real or Fake?

Not being shy about his gambling activities, Drake is known for posting his wins and losses on social media.

Published

on

Drake & Stake.com Partnership: Real or Fake?
Drake & Stake.com Partnership: Real or Fake?

Drake is one of the most talented artists in the entertainment industry. Drake is known to be a man of many talents, as he is not only a rapper, but also a singer, actor, fashion designer, and entrepreneur. Ever since he dropped his first album, “Thank Me Later,” in 2010, the Canadian artist has become a household name in the industry.

Recently, he partnered with British rapper 21 Savage to drop an album titled “Her Loss” in 2022, and the duo has been making the headlines ever since. Aside from being a prolific artist, Drake is also a businessman as he established OVO Sound, became the brand ambassador of the NBA’s Toronto Raptors, and also a part owner of Serie A’s AC Milan. 

Drake & Gambling

Before dropping an album with 21 Savage in 2022, the Canadian rapper made the headlines several times. The majority of them are about Drake’s gambling habits that he has managed to hone over the years. He has been a consistent subject in the gambling world, with him recently claiming a loss in a UFC match after betting on Israel Adesanya to win against Alex Pereira. That’s not the first time for the Canadian, so don’t be too worried for him.

Drake was so invested in his gambling habits that he got a partnership deal with Stake.com out of it. Stake is an online gambling company that operates in Canada and several other countries. Quite amazing, isn’t it? Back in December 2021, Drake was revealed to have joined Stake.com with the user name “DeepPockets6”. Two months after his registration, the Canadian wagered cryptocurrency worth over $1 billion on several sporting events and casino bets.

Drake & Stake Partnership: Real or Fake?

The “Thank Me Later” singer wasn’t shy about posting his gambling activities on social media for everyone to see. Back in February 2022, he uploaded a picture of himself wagering on live high-stakes roulette while watching a Toronto Raptors game. During all these posts from Drake, Stake’s logo has either appeared in his gambling-related posts or been tagged in them. 

While many expressed their concerns over Drake’s new love for gambling, others saw it as product placement and it could lead to a potential partnership between the crypto casino and the Canadian rapper. Soon after, in March 2022, Drake announced his partnership with Stake.com. But many still questioned the authenticity of the deal as many could only find it on Drake’s social media.

However, this partnership deal is as real as it gets. Visiting Stake.com/drake will let you see the details about the partnership deal signed between the crypto casino and Drake. From the website, it is noted that Stake & Drake partnered up to bring a “new gaming experience to users, which will include an evening of interactive connectivity where fans and users alike will have a chance to win big alongside Drake.”

A Brief History Of Drake’s Bets

Not being shy about his gambling activities, Drake is known for posting his wins and losses on social media. He has wagered on several sporting events like NFL, NBA, UFC, Formula 1, English Premier League and Spanish La Liga. 

Aside from wagering on sporting events, the Toronto rapper has also been noted to prefer roulette as his favourite casino game. His biggest success was during his live-streamed events with Stake when he won over $17 million in May. But he lost over $600,000 in wagering on Formula 1 and UFC bets in the same month.

His most recent bet was revealed on November 13, when he wagered on Israel Adesanya and Alex Pereira in UFC 281. He lost $2 million after betting on Adesanya to win the match, but Pereira came out on top.

The GlamourBuff Team is a set of experienced writers associated with the Glamour Buff magazine, reporting world news, celebrity lifestyle, and exclusive Hollywood details.

Popular

Nate Diaz Believes Mike Tyson Can Defeat Jake Paul in Boxing Match

Nate Diaz has picked Mike Tyson to be winner against Jake Paul.

Published

on

Nate Diaz Believes Mike Tyson Can Defeat Jake Paul in Boxing Match

Nate Diaz is not afraid to voice his opinions, and this time, he has picked the winner of one of the most anticipated boxing matches between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul. The veteran MMA fighter believes that the veteran 57-year-old boxer will defeat the former YouTuber and social media influencer.

Paul has been currently enjoying a series of wins after losing to Tomy Fury, and among them, one match was with Diaz himself.

Nate Diaz picks Mike Tyson as winner against Jake Paul

Diaz has picked the winner against Tyson and Paul and he didn’t hesitate picking the veteran boxer. In July 2020, the most anticipated boxing match between them was scheduled in Arlington, Texas.

Nate Diaz thinks Mike Tyson wins against Jake Paul

Nate Diaz thinks Mike Tyson won against Jake Paul. (Credit: Instagram)

At first, Diaz sounded like he didn’t think any of the match was going to happen, but later, he stated that Tyson would be the one whose arms would be raised by the referee. At first, he stated he couldn’t care less, but thinking for just a mere second, said Tyson.

Diaz himself is looking to come back to the ring whether it is in boxing or octagon. After losing to Paul he has not fought in any kind of combat matches.

Nate Diaz and Jorge Masvidal’s rivalry explained

Diaz is looking to get back in the boxing ring, this time with another MMA veteran, Jorge Masvidal.

They are scheduled to compete in a boxing match in Las Vegas this June. Happy Punch first reported the news, which was later confirmed by journalist Ariel Helwani. Previously the match was scheduled for March but now it has been postponed to June 1.

After the announcement, the MMA fighters are going back and forth against each other on various social media. Moreover, there have also been some rumors that the duo have agreed to have their rematch in the Octagon, possibly next year.

Jorge Masvidal calls out Nate Diaz

The upcoming MMA match between Masvidal and Diaz has recently received much attention. Masvidal posted a message challenging Diaz to a fight, expressing his confidence in defeating him.

This has added to the excitement surrounding the upcoming match, as both fighters are known for their intense fighting style. Masvidal’s callout has reignited fans’ interest in the rematch after he had kept quiet about his opponent for some time.

There has been a long rivalry between Diaz and Masvidal and fans are now about to witness two hardcore combat. They are set to fight in the boxing ring and may return to the octagon for the UFC 300 as the rematch for the first thrilling fight between the two.

Has Nate Diaz fought Jorge Masvidal Before?

Fans are excited about the boxing match between Diaz and Masvidal but those who watch the first fight between them are even more excited. The pair first fought each other in the main event of UFC 244 on Nov. 2, 2019, in Madison Square Garden.

In their previous fight, Masvidal was declared the winner over Diaz in the fourth round at UFC 244. Unfortunately, the match was halted by the ringside physician due to a cut on Diaz’s face.

This has led to a demand for a rematch, as both fighters have unfinished business. Masvidal wants to prove himself beyond doubt, while Diaz is seeking revenge. Hence the boxing match is gaining quite the buzz around the MMA audience as well.

Furthermore, if the rematch is announced in recent days then surely it will be one of the most watched events in the world. It is also not known if the event will take place in UFC or Jake Paul’s MMA company PFL.

Continue Reading

Popular

Animal Support Certificate: Everything You Need to Know

Published

on

Animal Support Certificate: Everything You Need to Know

Emotional support animals can change the way you approach a mental health disorder. Instead of relying on medications or other coping mechanisms to deal with mental health problems, you can welcome a support animal into your home. These animals can alleviate symptoms of anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and other mental health conditions.

While emotional support animals are efficient, that doesn’t mean they’re always easy to get. You can’t just say your pet is an emotional support animal without supporting evidence, you can get into trouble that way. Thankfully, getting an animal support certificate is a breeze when you know where to start.

Read on to learn more below.

What Is a Support Animal?

Before we cover what a support animal certificate is, it’s important to understand what a support animal is. A support animal, or emotional support animal (ESA), is a type of animal that’s there to provide emotional support for mental health conditions like anxiety, depression, and loneliness. An emotional support animal can be any companion animal as long as they’re friendly, respectful of property, and don’t bother others.

Most people get emotional support animals that remain with them in their homes, even if the home is not pet-friendly. However, you’ll need a support animal certificate if you want to live in a home that’s otherwise non-pet-friendly.

What’s the Difference Between a Support Animal and a Service Animal?

Emotional support animals and service animals are not the same thing. Service animals are protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). They can accompany people in non-pet-friendly housing, on airlines, and out in public. However, to meet these requirements, they must have service dog training and help someone with a disability with a specific task or tasks.

On the other hand, support animals are handled more like pets except in housing situations. For example, they can’t come with you in public or on airlines, but they are protected under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). This means that they can live in otherwise non-pet-friendly housing if they have a support animal certificate.

What Is a Support Animal Certificate?

A support animal certificate is an official document provided by a licenced mental health professional. These certificates, formally known as ESA letters, are essential if you want to live in housing that is otherwise not pet-friendly. You can get these certificates by visiting your licensed mental health professional or therapist, but it’s also possible to apply online. Plus, it’s usually a faster and more affordable process when you apply online.

How to Apply for a Support Animal Certificate Online

The best way to apply online is to work with a reputable organization like US Service Animals, especially if you want a legitimate ESA certification. They can connect you with a licensed therapist who will evaluate your situation to determine if you qualify for a support animal. To apply for an ESA letter, follow the steps below.

  1. Navigate to US Service Animal’s ESA certification page.
  2. Read the guidelines for registering your support animal.
  3. Provide details about yourself.
  4. Provide details about the animal, including its breed, weight, and height.
  5. Schedule a call with a licensed mental health professional.

Once you speak with a licensed mental health professional, they will determine if you’re eligible for a support dog. Once approved, all you have to do is wait for your letter to arrive in the mail. If time is of the essence, you may be able to expedite the process or download a PDF file.

How to Apply for a Support Animal Certificate in Person

Applying for a support animal certificate in person can be challenging.  Finding the right mental health professional can be tricky, and going to an in-person session can take up way more time when compared to a telehealth meeting.

However, there is something to be said for the personal connection made face-to-face. All told, it can take longer and cost more, but it’s still as simple as meeting with a mental health professional capable of diagnosing you and providing a support animal certificate.

Get an Animal Support Certificate Today!

An animal support certificate is the only thing standing in the way of you enjoying the benefits of an emotional support animal in your home. Once you have an ESA letter, you don’t have to worry about being evicted from your home, even if your landlord enacts non-pet-friendly housing rules. We always recommend filling out an online application to save time and money.

Continue Reading

Popular

Chick-Fil-A’s Chicken Makeover Fails to Impress Customers

Chick-fil-A’s recent announcement about changes to its chicken sourcing policies has ruffled some feathers.

Published

on

Chick-Fil-A’s Chicken Makeover Fails to Impress Customers

Chick-fil-A‘s recent announcement about changes to its chicken sourcing policies has ruffled some feathers. The popular fast food chain revealed it will no longer source chicken raised with certain antibiotics. 

This shift is part of the fast food chain’s ongoing effort to serve healthier menu items. However, many loyal customers are crowing about the changes. 

This article discusses the criticism over the updated chicken, causing a flap among its fan base.

Chick-fil-A backtracked its pledge made back in 2014

In 2014, Chick-fil-A promised its customers that it would serve only chicken raised entirely without antibiotics by 2019. 

This “no antibiotics ever” (NAE) policy addressed growing consumer demands for healthier, more sustainable meat options.

It successfully met this goal on schedule, becoming one of the first major fast-food chains to go antibiotic-free across its entire chicken supply. However, the food chain has backpedaled significantly on this NAE pledge a few years later. 

Chick-Fil-A building

Chick-fil-A building (Source: Parade)

In a statement released on March 21st, the company announced it would revert to allowing chickens to be treated with some antibiotics necessary for human medicine, pivoting to a “no antibiotics important to human medicine” (NAIHM) policy instead. 

The primary justification cited is increasingly strained chicken supply issues and difficulty sourcing enough high-quality, affordable, antibiotic-free poultry to meet demand. 

With significant suppliers like Tyson also reintroducing some antibiotics, the company felt it could no longer guarantee adherence to its original NAE standards.

While the NAIHM policy is still more restrictive than conventional industrial chicken farming practices, this backtracking has dismayed many customers who valued their former leadership on curbing antibiotic overuse in meat production.

Chick-fil-A’s new approach is a deal breaker for many customers

Chick-fil-A’s decision to walk back its pledge to serve 100% antibiotic-free chicken has struck a nerve with many loyal customers. 

Social media has been ablaze with criticism and outrage over this policy reversal. Customers take directly to Twitter (now X) without hesitation to quote their displeasure.

One person wrote: “No more Chick-fil-A for me after this antibiotics announcement. Deleting the app as we speak.” 

“Chick-fil-A going back on their ‘no antibiotics ever’ policy for chicken is a total deal breaker. They’ve lost a customer.”

“Well, there goes Chick-fil-A’s reputation for quality. Time to find a new chicken sandwich spot that doesn’t pump their poultry full of meds. #ByeChickfila”

While some customers appear willing to accept the “no antibiotics important to human medicine” policy, a vocal contingent draws a hard line. 

Boycott threats and actual deletions of the Chick-fil-A mobile app abound on social media right now from former fans who now view the chain as just another industrial food purveyor.

Customers also discovered the use of other chemicals

The revelations about Chick-fil-A’s use of numerous artificial chemicals and additives in their famous chicken sandwiches have compounded customer outrage over antibiotics. 

Some fans have gone down a rabbit hole investigating the ingredients, and what they claim to have found is disturbing.

According to one customer’s alleged deep dive, their chicken sandwich contains over 50 listed chemicals and ingredients, with over 40 being artificial synthetic compounds.

This same person alleges that after they publicly shared this information by breaking down the ingredient list on their website, the company quickly removed that public ingredient information.

The implication is that Chick-fil-A wants to obscure precisely what unsavory chemicals and additives go into making their famous chicken so addictive and moreish beyond just the antibiotic use. 

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and other flavor enhancers are considered suspect ingredients.

Anecdotal reports of customers claiming to have experienced physical symptoms like rashes after eating Chick-fil-A items have also surfaced alongside this ingredients controversy. 

There seems to be a growing belief among some fans that Chick-fil-A’s menu offerings are essentially “doped” or “drugged” processed foods that hook people through artificial means beyond just nutritional value.

Whether or not these chemical additive claims are accurate, they have raised alarm bells. Customers are questioning if Chick-fil-A can be trusted anymore now that their pure ingredients halo has been so tarnished, first by the antibiotics issue and now by this chemical revelation.

Some customers stood up for Chick-fil-A

While the backlash over Chick-fil-A’s policy reversal on antibiotics has been loud, some customers are also coming to the company’s defense on social media. Their main argument is one of pragmatism over idealism.

These supporters point out that raising chickens, especially at the massive scale required for a huge fast food chain, inevitably requires the judicious use of antibiotics at times. 

They argue that an “antibiotics never” policy is unrealistic and ignores standard industry practices.

As one customer stated: “Got to love how uneducated people are about raising chickens and how they do need antibiotics when they are raised in bulk.” 

“Another simple outbreak in the chicken industry can literally collapse the entire industry as there’s already a shortage as it is. A compromise is necessary.”

The critical point made by these defenders is that a total ban on antibiotic use is impractical and could potentially jeopardize Chick-fil-A’s supply chain. An across-the-board “no antibiotics important to human medicine” policy is portrayed as a reasonable compromise.

They contend that Chick-fil-A is simply bowing to industry realities to keep its operations running smoothly. They argue that reversing this revised, less restrictive standard is a prudent business decision to ensure consistent supply and avoid potential shortages or outbreaks.

While acknowledging the ideological appeal of 100% antibiotic-free poultry, this camp values pragmatism and risk management over lofty principles that may be difficult to logistically maintain long-term at such a large scale.

So, while many customers feel betrayed, Chick-fil-A has some support from fans who think this change, however unpalatable, may be necessary given the company’s size and conventional industry practices around antibiotics.

Continue Reading

Don't Miss

Please help us continue to provide free, quality journalism by disabling your ad blocker on glamourbuff.com.

Thank you for supporting our work.